måndag 14 september 2015

Theme 1: Reflection

Week 37 and the first theme, which was Theory of Knowledge and Theory of Science, has come to its end. In the beginning I found both of the texts we were supposed to read really hard to understand, they were long and quite complex. The lecture and the seminar helped me a lot to understand. I took the opportunity to ask all the questions I had from the texts and from the lecture during the seminar. I think misunderstood some part of Kant’s Critique of pure reason when I only had read the text. What I wish I had done for this week was to start earlier, that would have given me much more time to reflect about the texts before the first blog post and before the first lecture.


From this week I have learned that Kant is discussing the basics in time and space. He tried to understand what the world means in itself. And I thought it was interesting what was brought up at the seminar, that we don’t know about the world in itself. Since “in itself” is a concept that will die along if all people dies. The teacher asked us if the world will still exist if all people dies and as I understand from the seminar the answer will be no. This example goes along with the quote “Concept without perception is blind, and perception without concept is empty” and I believe that is what Kant means with object must conform to our cognition.


I also learned from the lecture about Kant’s categories, which is based on our conception. Those categories are very basic and becomes the structure of our world.
Table of Categories:
Quantity Quality Relation Modality
unity reality subsistence possibility
plurality negation causality existence
totality limitation community necessity

Before the lecture I had what the teacher called "the schoolbook version" of what Kant is saying in my mind. That we can only see what is perceived to us, like we see the world through glasses we cannot take of.

3 kommentarer:

  1. Hi Sanna!

    First, a well-written and reflective reflection! Well done! I also had troubles with understanding the content of the texts before the lectures. It's great that you took the time to try and ask all the questions that you had and that you cleared out your question marks. I also find the thought that you describe about the existence of our world intriguing, but I don't know if I can agree with that the world wouldn't exist without humans. Maybe you could formulate it on more of a form of that the world as a human perceives it will not exist anymore when we die out? I don't know.. but that's what philosophy is all about!

    Keep up the god work! :)

    SvaraRadera
  2. Hi Sanna,
    Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I agree with your ideas about "in itself", but I also think subject and object compose the world. So I am confused that if all people dies, wether will the world not exist? Anyway, your reflection is awesome!

    SvaraRadera
  3. Nice reflection! I can definitely relate to the issues you had when reading the Kant text. The entire process of the theme helped me get a better understanding of both text and it seems like you feel the same. It is interesting that you connect the quote from the lecture in such a direct way as an answer to one of Kant's concepts! I had not thought about it in such a direct way and it is an interesting approach. It would be interesting to also read about the seminar in your post-reflection! What did you discuss? How did discussing the concepts with the other students help your understanding?
    Good luck with the future themes! :D

    SvaraRadera